관심표준 등록 : 표준업데이트 시 알림을 받을 수 있습니다.
PDF : 직접 파일 다운로드 및 인쇄 (마이페이지 확인)
PRINT : 인쇄본 우편발송, 2~3일 소요(PDF파일 미제공)
분야 | |
---|---|
적용범위 | The process detailed within this document is generic and applies to the entire end-to-end health management capability, covering both on-board and on-ground elements, in both commercial and military applications throughout their lifecycle. This ARP addresses a gap in guidance related to usage of ground-based health management equipment for airworthiness credit, ensuring a level of integrity commensurate with the potential aircraft-level consequences of the relevant failure conditions. The practical application of this standardized process is detailed in the form of a checklist. The on-board elements described here are typically the source of the data acquisition used for off-board analysis. The on-board aspects relating to airworthiness and/or safety of flight, e.g., pilot notification, are addressed by existing guidance and policy documents. If a proposed health management capability for airworthiness credit involves modification of the on-board systems, the substantiation of those changes should be based on the applicable type certification guidance. This document does not prescribe hardware or software assurance levels, nor does it answer the question "how much mitigation and evidence are enough?" The criticality level and mitigation methods will be determined between the applicant and the regulator. There are cases where this process is applicable but may not be appropriate due to historical precedents. For example, there is a historical precedent for using an off-board health management solution to achieve compliance with Extended-Range Twin-Engine Operations Performance Standards (ETOPS) (refer to FAA AC 120-42A). In order to provide some detailed guidance utilizing the process and checklist, some high-level examples of previous successful cases of maintenance credit applications for airworthiness credit are included. Refer to ARP5120 for additional examples of practical mitigating measures applicable to health management systems. At this point, it is incumbent on the applicant to explain any differences in terminology between the health management system they are seeking credit for and the appropriate regulatory references. For example, the system name often uses interchangeable terms such as "Engine Health Monitoring," "Equipment Health Management," "Prognostic Health Management," "Powerplant Health Management," etc. |
국제분류(ICS)코드 | |
페이지수 | 0 |
Edition |
No. | 표준번호 | 표준명 | 발행일 | 상태 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | SAE ARP5987A | A Process for Utilizing Aerospace Propulsion Health Management Systems for Airworthiness Credit | 2024-04-01 | 표준 |
관련상품이 존재하지 않습니다.
함께 구입한 상품이 존재하지 않습니다.
IEC TS 63134:2020 - Active assisted living (AAL) use cases 상세보기
IEC 60034-5:2020 RLV - Rotating electrical machines - Part 5: Degrees of protection provided by the integral design of rotating electrical machines (IP code) - Classification 상세보기
KS B ISO TS 25740-1 - 에스컬레이터 및 무빙워크에 대한 안전요건 — 제1부: 세계공통 필수 안전요건(GESRs) 상세보기
KS B ISO TS 8100-21 - 승객 및 화물 운송용 엘리베이터 —제21부: 세계공통 필수안전요건(GESRs)을 충족하는 세계공통 안전 파라미터(GSPs) 상세보기
KS C IEC TS 62872 - 산업 시설과 스마트 그리드 사이의 산업 공정 측정, 제어 및 자동화 시스템 인터페이스 상세보기